Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Role of endometrial receptivity array for implantation failure in in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Background and Objective: Assisted reproductive technique is an evolving field with many recent advances. The success rate is low in developing countries where financial concerns prevail predominantly. This prospective study was designed for the first time in any hospital in Pakistan to determine the role of Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) in patients with previous implantation failure to improve pregnancy outcome and to enhance the success rate of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Methods: This study was carried out at the Lahore Institute of Fertility and Endocrinology, Lahore-Pakistan from December, 2019 to October, 2020. A total of 16 patients were recruited after taking written informed consent. Only those patients were selected who had previous one or more implantation failures in IVF/ICSI cycles and had at least two or more good quality frozen embryos. RNA was obtained from the endometrial sample to check ERA through 238 genes expressed using RNA sequencing. Beta HCG level and scans were performed to confirm the clinical pregnancy. Results: All enrolled patients had an ERA test and their embryos transferred according to personalized window of implantation (WOI). A total of 5 (31.3%) patients were stimulated with a long protocol while 11 (68.7%) underwent a short protocol. WOI was receptive in 12 (75%) patients, pre-receptive in 3 (18.2%) and post-receptive in 1 (6.2%), and most of patients showed receptivity at P5 (109-145 hours). Twelve patients (75%) had clinical pregnancy evident by positive beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) after embryo transfer. A significant association was found between WOI and receptivity (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of ERA in our study seem promising, especially in patients with previous one or more implantation failures. Although we have limited number of patients keeping in mind its financial constraints, especially in the developing countries, still ERA is considered a way of hope, especially for those patients who have previous implantation failures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Biomedica is the property of Discover STM Publishing Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.