Problematizing the wickedness of the Fundão dam rupture: Are cross-sector partnerships enough to bring about the Doce river basin recovery process?

This paper aims to draw attention to the intricacies of hybrid network governance in a challenging institutional landscape. The empirical focus is a case study of the recovery process from the Fundão dam rupture, Brazil's most significant environmental disaster, and the largest in the world involving tailings dams. To drill into the barriers to cross-sector partnerships, we adopted a multi-methods approach, including interviews, grey materials and documents, participant observation and social network analysis. We identified interrelated barriers and grouped them into institutional, power and knowledge barriers, which act through a positive feedback loop leading to a structural arrangement that is inadequate for collaboration in disaster management. As a result, the Doce river basin's recovery process has taken the form of a wicked industrial disaster, enabling a "chain reaction" of increasing wickedness. We thereby advance cross-sector partnership research by drawing attention to the underlying causes of failure and offer guidance to public and private managers on possible strategies to address the barriers to cross-sector partnerships. • Wicked industrial disasters are processual phenomena, not just an event with an impact. • Interrelated barriers create a positive feedback cycle hindering collaboration. • Cross-sector partnerships barriers are complex and create uncertainty and dispute. • Cross-sector partnership should have been formed based on moral and material concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Environmental Science & Policy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)