حكم النبوة بني الفرق يف التاريخ اإلسالمي (األشاعرة واملعتزلة والفالسفة) أمنوذجاً - دراسة حتليلية مقارنة نقدية -. (Arabic)

The rule of prophethood between the difference in Islamic history (Ash'ari, Mu'tazila, and philosophers) as a model - A Critical Comparative Analysis Study -. (English)

Prophethood and the mission are among the doctrinal issues around which there has been much talk among the sects in Islamic history from various sides. As for their ruling - which is the subject of research - some Islamic sects went to the ruling that it is obligatory, such as the Mu'tazila and those who agreed with them This is based on their saying that God Almighty must be righteous and fittest, and the whole mission is goodness and goodness, as it is obligatory, and the philosophers went to rule that it is affirmative based on their doctrine based on causes and natures, The Ash'ari and those who agreed with them went on to say that it is possible and permissible, so existence and nothingness are equal in it, and its existence or lack thereof is not necessary, and that is based on their origin saying that it is not obligatory for God Almighty. He disagreed with it, and through this research I will stand on the reality of these differences in the ruling of prophethood, in order to try to show the truth and destroy the falsehood of these ideas with evidence and proof, and before going into discussion of opinions and statement of sayings, I will know the Prophet and the Messenger in terms of language and idiom and the difference between them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

النبوة والبعثة من المسائل العقدية التي دار حولها كالم كثير بين الفرق في التاريخ اإلسالمي من جهات متعددة، فمن جهة حكمها – وهو موضوع البحث - ذهب ت بعض الفر ق اإلسالمية إلى ال حكم بوجوبها كالمعتزلة ومن وافقهم؛ وذلك انطالقاً من قولهم بوجوب الصالح واألصلح على هللا تعالى، والبعثة كلها صالح و ُح ْس ٌن فهي واجبة، وذهب الفالسفة إلى الحكم بإيجابها انطالقاً من مذهبهم القائم على العلل والطبائع، وذهب األشاعرة ومن وافقهم إلى القول بإمكانها وجوازها فيستوي فيها الوجود والعدم، وال يترتب على وجودها أو عدمها محال، وذلك انطالقا على هللا تعالى، فشرعت كل فرقة بذكر األدلة والبراهين التي تعتقد صوابها، وتنصر معتقدها، وتقدم ً من أصلهم القائل بنفي الوجوب سهام النقد والبطالن لمن خالفها، ومن خالل بحثي هذا سأقف على حقيقة هذه الفرق في حكم النبوة، ألحاول أن أظهر الحق وأهدم الباطل من تلكم األفكار بالحجة والبرهان، وقبل الخوض في مناقشة اآلراء وبيان ا ألقوال وبيان الفرق بينهما. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of IUG Journal of Islamic Studies is the property of Islamic University of Gaza and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)