Hemodynamic evaluation of patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy: comparison of resting-state fMRI to breath-hold fMRI and [¹⁵O]water PET.

Purpose: Patients with Moyamoya Angiopathy (MMA) require hemodynamic evaluation to assess the risk of stroke. Assessment of cerebral blood flow with [¹⁵O]water PET and acetazolamide challenge is the diagnostic standard for the evaluation of the cerebral perfusion reserve (CPR). Estimation of the cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) by use of breath-hold-triggered fMRI (bh-fMRI) as an index of CPR has been proposed as a reliable and more readily available approach. Recent findings suggest the use of resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) which requires minimum patient compliance. The aim of this study was to compare rs-fMRI to bh-fMRI and [¹⁵O]water PET in patients with MMA. Methods: Patients with MMA underwent rs-fMRI and bh-fMRI in the same MRI session. Maps of the CVR gained by both modalities were compared retrospectively by calculating the correlation between the mean CVR of 12 volumes of interest. Additionally, the rs-maps of a subgroup of patients were compared to CPR-maps gained by [¹⁵O]water PET. Results: The comparison of the rs-maps and the bh-maps of 24 patients revealed a good correlation (Pearson's r = 0.71 ± 0.13; preoperative patients: Pearson's r = 0.71 ± 0.17; postoperative patients: Pearson's r = 0.71 ± 0.11). The comparison of 7 rs-fMRI data sets to the corresponding [¹⁵O]water PET data sets also revealed a high level of agreement (Pearson's r = 0.80 ± 0.19). Conclusion: The present analysis indicates that rs-fMRI might be a promising non-invasive method with almost no patient cooperation needed to evaluate the CVR. Further prospective studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Neuroradiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)