الفن اللفظي والاختلافات اللغوية عند الإمام طاهر بن عاشور أه) في تفسيره. (Arabic)

Verbal artand linguistic differences in Imam Taher ibn Ashour Ah) in his interpretation 3131. (English)

The science in the Book of Allah is one of the most honored sciences and for the sake of knowledge, and going into the orchards of interpretations is more complete, so since I have chosen to research my study of the Doctor in the criticism of Taher Bin Ashour (2171H) for the theory of verbal artfulness on many good, and grace like the rich sea, because I read what I did not know before, so I chose to research the phenomenon of artioning at Imam Mohammed bin Ashour in his interpretation of liberation and enlightenment. To prove first that the verbal artoning on a large comment in the sense and context, and the place of the conditions of the speakers, and that the Qur'an is enriched in different ways of expression according to his eloquence and what appears to be his miracle, and I chose here to look for one phenomenon in which the Qur'an is in the interpretation of words and adapting them to meaning and context, and did not more than the presentation, as the research does not expand, and I referred to my study there for more statement and detail, but our research here was based on two main researchers. The first is entitled: Taher Bin Ashour, Editing and Enlightenment, and the second is entitled: Verbal artening in linguistic differences, and there are four points: linguistic differences in sources and their names, and the second: linguistic differences in names, and the fourth: in the linguistic differences in the verbs, and then the research concluded with a conclusion reached the most important results, and not more so as not to waste the sweetness of reading in my thesis, and from God bless. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

والصلاة والسلاـ عمى رسوؿ ، وباسط الارض مف غير أحد، بسـ الله خالؽ السماء بلا ع ة ، نبي الرحمة،الله ماـ الام ا ض ، و السماء والار ِّ وعمى ، وشفيع الخمؽ يوـ العرض عمى رب ، وصحبو الأبارر ،آلو الاخيار ف سار عمى نيجو ما تعاقب الميؿ والنيار َ ... وبعد، وم ؼ المعار ِّ والخوض في ، فإف العمـ في كتاب الله تعالى مف أشرؼ العموـ وأجؿ لذا فقد اخترت البحث في ظاىرة التفنف عند الإماـ محمد ،بساتيف التفاسير أكمؿ المشارؼ بف عاش و التفنف المفظي عمى عموؽ كبير أف ًلاّ لأثبت أو ، ر في تفسيره التحرير والتنوير ، ومقاـ أحواؿ المخاطبيف ،بالمعنى والسياؽ آف تفنف في مختمؼ أساليب التعبير القر وأف ه ظير اعجاز ُ ا لبلاغتو وبما ي ً واخترت ىنا البحث عف ظاىرة واحدة عنده وىي تفنف ، تبع ولـ أُكثر مف العرض إذ ، القرآف الكريـ في الفروؽ المغوية وموائمتيا لممعنى والسياؽ ، وأشرت الى دارستي ىناؾ لمزيد بياف وتفصيؿ ،البحث لا يتسع ا بحثنا ىنا فقاـ عمى أم تمييد وأربعة مباحث: ر عف حياة الطاىر والتحرير والتنوي ً فيو شيئا ُ ا التمييد فأوضحت ، أم ا المبح أم ف ا ؿ فبعنو ّ والثاني: الفروؽ ، ث الأو: الفروؽ المغوية في المصادر وأسمائيا والثالث: في الفروؽ المغوية في المشتقات، والاربع: في الفروؽ ،المغوية في الأفعاؿ ،المغوية في الأسماء النتائج ِّ البحث بخاتمة توصمت فييا لأىـ ُ ختمت ـُ ولـ أُكثر لئلا ، ث . ومف الله التوفيؽ، [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Historical & Cultural Studies an Academic Magazine is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)