- Alternate Title:
ŠARČEVIĆ'S HUMANISM FOR THE ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY. (English)
- Abstract:
In this paper we will deal with the ethics of responsibility in the context of Abdulah Šarčević's conception of humanism with the assumption of a new world ethos that will indicate alternative possibilities for the development of differentiated forms of life and knowledge, as well as an open society for a new and different positioning of man and humanity. Pointing to a rational experience of the world and life, philosophy is presented as an open spiritual reflex to all beings, which as a view (theory) contributes to understanding ideas mentally and critically, on the basis of which values whose character is often regulatory are determined and built in terms of seeking and funding what is permanent and important to us when it comes to interpersonal relationships. However, by approaching many values in both theoretical and practical discourse, the ethical-moral discourse of valuation and values is bypassed, especially when it comes to the phenomenology of interpersonal relationships. Namely, it is first necessary to preserve the dialogue of ideas, to reconstruct their new discourse with the reflection of a new world that frees us for human, cosmocentric housing and return to what is our own, which cannot be managed in any way. This is simply not about the limits of ethical judgment, which appear when questions of justice are introduced into the game, but also of moral obligation, but also of questions concerning the sources, scope and limits of humanum violations. Namely, such an approach leads not only to an insight into the structure of human monologues, but also to the influence on interpersonal relations concerning: work and action, language and opinion, creativity and culture, sociability and history, tradition and modernity. Thus it opens a demand in the persistence of a critical redefinition of some important ethical aspects of interpersonal relations within which the differences of ethical-moral phenomena of human reality are reflected, which gave rise to different values, as well as moral-value discourses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
U ovom radu ćemo se baviti etikom odgovornosti u kontekstu koncepcije humanizma Abdulaha Šarčevića sa pretpostavkom jednog novog svjetskog ethosa koji će ukazati na alternativne mogućnosti razvitka diferenciranih formi života i znanja, kao i otvorenog društva za jedno novo i drugačije pozicioniranje čovjeka i čovječnosti u savremenom svijetu. Ukazujući na racionalno iskustvo o svijetu i životu, filozofija se prikazuje kao otvoreni duhovni refleks prema svim bivstvujućim, koja kao gledanje (teorija) doprinosi da se ideje shvate misaono i kritički, na osnovu čega se određuju i grade vrijednosti čiji je karakter često regulativni u smislu traženja i fundiranja onog što je trajno i za nas bitno kada je riječ o međuljudskim odnosima. Međutim, pristupanjem mnogim vrijednostima i u teorijskom, i u praktičkom diskursu upravo se zaobilazi etičko- moralni diskurs vrednovanja i vrijednosti, pogotovo kada je riječ o fenomenologiji međuljudskih odnosa. Najprije je potrebno sačuvati dijalog ideja, rekonstruisati njihov novi diskurs sa promišljanjem novog svijeta koji nas oslobađa za ljudsko, kosmocentričko stanovanje i vraćanje u ono što je naše vlastito, čime nije moguće na bilo koji način upravljati. Tu, naprosto, nije riječ o granicama etičkog načina prosuđivanja, koje se pojavljuju kada se u igru uvedu pitanja o pravičnosti, ali i moralne obaveznosti, već i o pitanjima koja se odnose na izvore, obim i granice narušavanja humanuma. Naime, prema takvom pristipu se dolazi, ne samo, do uvida u strukturu čovjekovih monologa, već i uticaja na međuljudske odnose koji se tiču: rada i djelovanja, jezika i mišljenja, stvaralaštva i kulturaliteta, društvenosti i povijesnosti, tradicionaliteta i moderniteta. Tako se istovremeno otvara zahtjev u istrajavanju kritičkog redefinisanja nekih bitnih etičkih aspekata međuljudskih odnosa unutar kojih se ogledaju različitosti etičko-moralnih fenomena ljudske stvarnosti, koji su iznjedrili različite vrijednosti, kao i moralno-vrednosne diskurse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Sociološka Luča is the property of Socioloska Luca and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.