Is physician self-disclosure related to patient evaluation of office visits?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Beach MC;Beach MC; Roter D; Rubin H; Frankel R; Levinson W; Ford DE
  • Source:
    Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2004 Sep; Vol. 19 (9), pp. 905-10.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8605834 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0884-8734 (Print) Linking ISSN: 08848734 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Gen Intern Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Secaucus, NJ : Springer
      Original Publication: [Philadelphia, PA] : Hanley & Belfus, [c1986-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Context: Physician self-disclosure has been viewed either positively or negatively, but little is known about how patients respond to physician self-disclosure.
      Objective: To explore the possible relationship of physician self-disclosure to patient satisfaction.
      Design: Routine office visits were audiotaped and coded for physician self-disclosure using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Physician self-disclosure was defined as a statement describing the physician's personal experience that has medical and/or emotional relevance for the patient. We stratified our analysis by physician specialty and compared patient satisfaction following visits in which physician self-disclosure did or did not occur.
      Participants: Patients (N= 1,265) who visited 59 primary care physicians and 65 surgeons.
      Main Outcome Measure: Patient satisfaction following the visit.
      Results: Physician self-disclosure occurred in 17% (102/589) of primary care visits and 14% (93/676) of surgical visits. Following visits in which a primary care physician self-disclosed, fewer patients reported feelings of warmth/friendliness (37% vs 52%; P =.008) and reassurance/comfort (42% vs 55%; P =.027), and fewer reported being very satisfied with the visit (74% vs 83%; P =.031). Following visits in which a surgeon self-disclosed, more patients reported feelings of warmth/friendliness (60% vs 45%; P =.009) and reassurance/comfort (59% vs 47%; P=.044), and more reported being very satisfied with the visit (88% vs 75%; P =.007). After adjustment for patient characteristics, length of the visit, and other physician communication behaviors, primary care patients remained less satisfied (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.81) and surgical patients more satisfied (AOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.12 to 4.50) after visits in which the physician self-disclosed.
      Conclusions: Physician self-disclosure is significantly associated with higher patient satisfaction ratings for surgical visits and lower patient satisfaction ratings for primary care visits. Further study is needed to explore these intriguing findings and to define the circumstances under which physician self-disclosure is either well or poorly received.
    • Comments:
      Comment in: J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):984. (PMID: 15333065)
    • References:
      Fam Med. 1987 Jan-Feb;19(1):23-30. (PMID: 3552832)
      Med Care. 1986 Oct;24(10):891-903. (PMID: 3762239)
      J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Sep;9(9):517-21. (PMID: 7996296)
      JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1445-9. (PMID: 7723159)
      JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1345-6. (PMID: 7563556)
      JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1346. (PMID: 7563557)
      JAMA. 1997 Jan 22-29;277(4):350-6. (PMID: 9002500)
      JAMA. 1997 Feb 19;277(7):553-9. (PMID: 9032162)
      Pediatrics. 1994 Feb;93(2):289-95. (PMID: 8121743)
      Acad Med. 1999 Nov;74(11):1242-8. (PMID: 10587689)
      BMJ. 2000 Feb 26;320(7234):541-4. (PMID: 10688559)
      Arch Fam Med. 2000 Mar;9(3):287-90. (PMID: 10728118)
      Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):27-36. (PMID: 11013545)
      Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jun 5;134(11):1079-85. (PMID: 11388827)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):911-6. (PMID: 15333054)
      Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):535-49. (PMID: 7109738)
      Pediatrics. 1984 Dec;74(6):1047-53. (PMID: 6504624)
    • Grant Information:
      R01 07289 United States PHS HHS
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Indexing Agency: KIE Local ID #: 126392.
      Keywords: Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
      Note: 20 refs. Note: KIE Bib: professional patient relationship
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20040831 Date Completed: 20050104 Latest Revision: 20181113
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC1492510
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40040.x
    • Accession Number:
      15333053