Legal Information Needs of Lawyers of Tehran City. (English)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      نیبزهبی اطلاعبتی حقوقی وکلای ضهر تهران. (Arabic)
    • Abstract:
      Objective: Access to the right legal information at the right time is a must for the community and for lawyers. The use of information by lawyers and attorneys is strongly influenced by their information needs. These requirements determine the type of information needed, where the information can be found, and how to access it. Lawyers use a variety of methods to access information. Legal information is the most important source for the law and legal professions and without the right legal information; these professions do not perform well. Methodology: The purpose of this study was to determine the legal information needs of Tehran's lawyers. Legal information needs are those that are met through the use of information resources and through formal or semi-formal channels of information and services offered by libraries and information centers. This research is a survey. The statistical population includes all lawyers in Tehran whose names are registered with the Center for Justice Lawyers. From a total of 8000 statistical population, 367 individuals were selected using Krejcie and Morgan's table by random sampling. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of two sections: general information and specialized information. In order to improve the validity of the research instrument, previously tested and validated questions asked in the questionnaires of previous studies conducted in the field of information needs were used in a similar context; and Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. Assessment and selection of sources and barriers to the information process were over 0.70 and acceptable. Data were analyzed using the Friedman Ranking Test and Bivariate Chi-square test in the SPSS software version 25. Findings: The results indicated that the most important reasons for seeking information for lawyers were promoting specialized knowledge and the most important sources for meeting the legal information needs of legal entities, were attending law courses and scientific journal articles. The most important problems for lawyers were access to updated information, the dissemination of legal information in different sources, the outdated nature of many sources, and the inadequate sources of law. Conclusion: The most important reason for searching information was to update specialized knowledge and then to write a research paper, which shows the scientific attitude of the lawyers towards their specialized field. Books (both printed and electronic) and scientific journals were the most important information sources for meeting the information needs of lawyers. Among informal sources, the library of a legal organization or institution was the most important source of informal acquisition of information; and the Google search engine was the most common search engine used by lawyers. Also, going to the library and visiting the new library resources were the most important ways to update information after reading specialized publications. The suggestions of the study are as follows: (i) the fact that many people today use the Internet to find answers to their questions, lawyers are not an exception. One way to help them is to make legal online databases accessible and expandable; (ii) due to the diffusion of legal information in different sources, the legality of many legal information sources and the inadequate legal information sources, one of the most important problems for lawyers in accessing information is the need to take appropriate measures; (iii) since legal libraries are one of the places of interest for lawyers to access the information, libraries or legal organizations should select law librarians as managers for courthouse libraries/court law libraries; and (iv) the findings showed that the level of French and English language of lawyers was poor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      سَف: سّف پژ صٍّ حبضز، ض بٌسبیی یًبس بّی اعلاػبتی حم لَی کٍلای ض زْ ت زْاى ث زَ. ه ظٌ رَ اس یًبس بّی اعلاػبتی حم لَی، آى زست اس یًبس بّیی است ک اس عزیك استفبز اس ه بٌثغ اعلاػبتی اس عزیك هجزا بّی رسوی یب یًو رسوی ارائ اعلاػبت ذسهبت کتبثرب بّ هزاکش اعلاع رسب یً ثزآ رٍز هی ض سًَ. ريش ضىاسی: ایي پژ صٍّ ث ر شٍ پیوبیطی غ رَت گزفت است. جبهؼ آهبری ضبهل توبهی کٍلای ض زْ ت زْاى است ک اسبهی آى بّ زر کب ىًَ کٍلای زازگستزی هزکش ثجت ضس است. اس هجو عَ 8000 فًز جبهؼ آهبری، حجن وً ای ثب استفبز اس جس لٍ کزجسی ه رَگبى ث تؼساز 367 فًز تؼییي ث ضی وً گیزی تػبزفی ا تًربة ضس. اثشار گززآ رٍی زاز بّ پزسص بًه هحمك سبذت ث زَ ک ضبهل ز ثرص اعلاػبت ػو هَی اعلاػبت ترػػی ث زَ. ثزای ثبلا ثززى ر اٍیی اثشار پژ صٍّ، اس پزسص بّی آسه ىَ ضس لجلی زر پژ صٍّ بّی هطبث هؼتجز استفبز ضس ثزای تؼییي پبیبیی پزسص بًه اس آلفبی کز جًٍبخ استفبز ضس ک ضزایت آى ثزای هتغیز بّی پژ صٍّ ک ضبهل ا سّاف ا گًیش بّی جستج یَ اعلاػبت، یٍژگی بّی 0 لبثل لج لَ ث زَ. تجشی تحلیل زاز بّی ث زست آهس ثب استفبز اس آسه ىَ / ارسیبثی ا تًربة ه بٌثغ ه اَ غً فزای سٌ اعلاع یبثی ث زَ سً، ثبلاتز اس 70 رتج ث سٌی فزیسهي آسه ىَ ذی ز تک هتغیز زر زًم افشار اس.پی.اس.اس. ا جًبم ضس. یافت اٍَ: تًبیج حبکی اس آى ث زَ ک ه وْتزیي زلیل جستج یَ اعلاػبت کٍلا، پیطجزز زاصً ترػػی ه وْتزیي ه بٌثغ ثزای رفغ یًبس بّی اعلاػبتی حم لَی همزرات حم لَی، ضزکت زر کبرگب بّی آه سَضی حم لَی همبل بّی هجل بّی ػلوی سّت سٌ. وّچ یٌي ا نّ هطکلات کٍلا ثزای زستیبثی ث اعلاػبت، پزاک سٌگی اعلاػبت حم لَی زر ه بٌثغ هرتلف، لسیوی ث زَى ثسیبری اس ه بٌثغ بًکبفی ث زَى ه بٌثغ زر سهی حم قَ هؼزفی ضس سً. وتیج گٍیری: ه وْتزیي زلیل جستج یَ اعلاػبت، پیطجزز زاصً ترػػی پس اس آى ارائ همبل پژ طٍّی است ک ایي یبفت ثیب گًز گًزش ػلوی پبسد گ یَبى سًجت ث رضت ترػػی ذ زَ است. کتبة بّ)اػن اس چبپی-الکتز یًٍکی(طًزیبت ه وْتزیي ه بٌثغ رسوی کست اعلاػبت زر رفغ یًبس بّی اعلاػبتی کٍلا سّت سٌ. زر هیبى ه بٌثغ غیزرسوی، کتبثرب سبسهبى یب هؤسس حم لَی، ه وْتزیي ه جٌغ کست غیزرسوی اعلاػبت است؛ ه تَ رَ جستج یَ گ گَل رایج تزیي ه تَ رَ جستج یَ ه رَز استفبز کٍلا است. وّچ یٌي، هزاجؼ ث کتبثرب ثبسزیس اس تبس بّی کتبثرب ،ًِ ثؼس اس هغبلؼ طًزیبت ترػػی، ه وْتزیي ر شٍ بّی ر سٍآهسسبسی اعلاػبت سّت سٌ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Library & Information Sciences (1680-9637) is the property of Central Library of Astan Quds Razavi and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)