A comparison of prefabricated and custom made resting hand splints for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To compare prefabricated and custom resting hand splints and establish the feasibility of splinting research for larger scale trials. Design: A Randomized controlled pilot study where the randomization unit was each hand, rather than each individual. Setting: Thirty-two-bed spinal cord injury and multi-trauma rehabilitation unit in an urban academic rehabilitation center. Subjects: Thirty-six hands from 19 individuals with cervical spinal cord injury were enrolled during their acute rehabilitation stay. Interventions: Each eligible hand was randomized to receive a custom or prefabricated resting hand splint for night use. Main measures: The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) was completed at both admission and discharge, and a structured interview was completed at discharge. Results: No difference existed in GRASSP outcomes or user preference between custom and prefabricated resting hand splints. Mann-Whitney tests indicated that there was no significant difference in qualitative prehension scores (U = 141, P = 0.522) nor quantitative prehension scores (U = 135, P = 0.382) between groups. Adherence to the splinting program was high (18 out of 19 participants), and no adverse effects occurred. Four themes emerged from the participant comments: the participants felt splints were helpful in their recovery; they found it challenging to direct their caregivers to help with the splints; they needed to take ownership for managing their splints; and they wished they received more education on splint rationale. Conclusion: There was no obvious difference in outcome or user preference between prefabricated and custom resting hand splints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Clinical Rehabilitation is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)