Are Websites Places of "Public Accommodation" for Purposes of the ADA? The Eleventh Circuit Says "No".

Winn-Dixie admitted that the ADA applies to its physical grocery stores, but argued that the website was not a place of "public accommodation" subject to the ADA. The Eleventh Circuit then addressed the plaintiff's claim that the ADA also forbids intangible barriers that prevent an individual from enjoying the goods and services of a place of public accommodation. Are Websites Places of "Public Accommodation" for Purposes of the ADA?. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Business Law Today is the property of American Bar Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)