Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Manual versus semiautomatic segmentation of soft-tissue sarcomas on magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of similarity and comparison of segmentation times.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Alternate Title:
Sarcomas de tecidos moles nas imagens de ressonância magnética: avaliação da similaridade entre as segmentações manual e semiautomática, e comparação do tempo de segmentação entre os métodos.
- Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the degree of similarity between manual and semiautomatic segmentation of soft-tissue sarcomas on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 15 MRI examinations of patients with histopathologically confirmed soft-tissue sarcomas acquired before therapeutic intervention. Manual and semiautomatic segmentations were performed by three radiologists, working independently, using the software 3D Slicer. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance were calculated in order to evaluate the similarity between manual and semiautomatic segmentation. To compare the two modalities in terms of the tumor volumes obtained, we also calculated descriptive statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: In the comparison between manual and semiautomatic segmentation, the DSC values ranged from 0.871 to 0.973. The comparison of the volumes segmented by the two modalities resulted in ICCs between 0.9927 and 0.9990. The DSC values ranged from 0.849 to 0.979 for intraobserver variability and from 0.741 to 0.972 for interobserver variability. There was no significant difference between the semiautomatic and manual modalities in terms of the segmentation times (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There appears to be a high degree of similarity between manual and semiautomatic segmentation, with no significant difference between the two modalities in terms of the time required for segmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Objetivo: Verificar a similaridade entre as segmentações manual e semiautomática de sarcomas de tecidos moles na ressonância magnética (RM) e a similaridade interobservador e intraobservador entre as segmentações manuais. Materiais e Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo que incluiu 15 exames de RM de pacientes com diagnóstico de sarcoma de tecidos moles realizados antes de intervenções terapêuticas. As segmentações manual e semiautomática foram realizadas por três radiologistas utilizando o software 3D Slicer. O coeficiente de similaridade Dice (CSD) e a distância de Hausdorff foram utilizados para avaliar a similaridade das segmentações. Análise estatística descritiva e coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) foram realizados para comparar volumes tumorais. Resultados: A comparação dos métodos manual e semiautomático obteve valores de CSD entre 0,871 e 0,973. A comparação dos volumes segmentados pelos dois métodos de segmentação mostrou CCI entre 0,9927 e 0,9990. As análises intraobservador e interobservador obtiveram valores de CSD, respectivamente, de 0,849 a 0,979 e de 0,741 a 0,972. Não houve diferença significativa entre os tempos de segmentação dos métodos semiautomático e manual (p > 0,05). Conclusão: Houve alta similaridade entre as segmentações de sarcomas de tecidos moles obtidas pelos métodos manual e semiautomático, sem diferença significativa para o tempo despendido para as segmentações. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Radiologia Brasileira is the property of Radiologia Brasileira and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.