Perceptions of the scope of practice of nurse practitioners caring for older adults: level of agreement among different healthcare providers.

TEAMS in the workplace; TEACHING; NURSES' attitudes; ATTITUDE (Psychology); CROSS-sectional method; RESEARCH methodology; INTERNET; NURSING specialties; MEDICAL personnel; QUANTITATIVE research; NURSING practice; CLINICAL supervision; QUALITATIVE research; GERIATRIC nursing; QUESTIONNAIRES; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; RESEARCH funding; SUPERVISION of employees; DATA analysis software; ELDER care; MEDICAL research

Background: Globally, new nurse practitioner roles have been introduced into interdisciplinary teams. Research indicates that agreement among the different healthcare providers regarding one another's role and scope of practice is important for establishing interdisciplinary teamwork. Lack of agreement regarding a new nurse practitioner's scope of practice may hinder collaboration. Aim: To investigate the level of agreement among advanced geriatric nurses (AGNs), their colleagues and their leaders regarding which activities related to direct and indirect care, teaching/supervision, coordination and research and development work are perceived as appropriate for AGNs. Design: A cross‐sectional descriptive survey. Methods: The total population of AGNs in Norway (n = 26) and a sample of their colleagues, including leaders (n = 465), were invited to answer an online questionnaire. Twenty‐three (88.5%) AGNs and 195 (42%) colleagues answered the questionnaires. A series of cross‐tabulations were conducted to identify the respondents reporting on the appropriateness of different activities. Results: The respondents identified all of the activities related to coordination, teaching/supervision and research and development work as appropriate for AGNs. Although the respondents considered several of the direct and indirect care activities as appropriate, there were conflicting views on the activities that traditionally fall within the medical field vs. those that traditionally fall within the nursing field. The AGNs saw most of the nursing and medical activities as appropriate, but their colleagues and leaders saw only some of the nursing activities as appropriate. The results also showed that there was high disagreement among the leaders regarding appropriate activities. Conclusion: The results indicate that healthcare providers agree on which activities related to teaching/supervision, coordination, and research and development work are appropriate to include in AGNs' scope of practice, but that there are conflicting views regarding activities related to direct and indirect care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)