Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
네덜란드와 노르웨이의 난민 학위·자격 평가인정제도 비교 분석.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): 채재은1
- Source:
Journal of Digital Convergence. 2021, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p37-45. 9p.
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Alternate Title:
Comparative Analysis of Evaluation and Recognition for Refugees’ Qualification in Netherlands and Norway.
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Since the Syrian Civil War in 2011, the number of refugees has been on the rise in Korea as well as worldwide. In addition to recognition of legal status for refugees, employment and education support, and qualification recognition are emerging as social issues. In this context, this study aims to compare the cases of Netherlands and Norway in terms of evaluation and recognition of refugees’ qualifications. The findings of the study show that although there were concerns about the lack of official documents to verify the qualifications of refugees, the two countries have developed a special process for the evaluation and recognition for refugees respectively according to the Lisbon Recognition Convention. In addition, both countries have developed a recognition of prior learning system which has made the qualification recognition process flexible from a point of refugees. These experiences could be used as benchmarks for the Korean government which has a responsibility to develop its own qualification recognition system for refugees in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Journal of Digital Convergence is the property of Society of Digital Policy & Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.