Magnetic cholecysto-duodenal anastomosis.

There is a growing interest in minimally invasive endoscopic gallbladder drainage therapies. Unlike stenting, a technology based on magnetic compression could theoretically produce a durable drainage anastomosis without residual foreign material. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of a cholecysto-duodenal magnetic compression anastomosis. We performed a survival study of two Yorkshire pigs. Duodenal magnets were deployed endoscopically; reciprocal gallbladder magnets were placed laparoscopically, and the magnets were coupled. Pigs underwent serial endoscopy documenting magnet expulsion and evolution of cholecysto-duodenal anastomosis creation. Necropsies and histological evaluation were performed. Primary endpoints were technical success and safety. Secondary endpoints included anastomosis integrity, patency, and histologic characteristics. Magnets were successfully delivered and coupled. Patent, leak-free anastomoses formed by day 4. Magnets were expelled by day 10. All anastomoses were widely patent at one month (mean diameter 15 mm). Necropsy showed the absence of adhesions affecting the anastomosis. Histology showed complete re-epithelialization without inflammation or foreign body reaction. Magnetic cholecysto-duodenal anastomosis for gallbladder drainage appears safe and feasible in the animal model. The anastomoses are patent, leak-free, and without inflammation from the presence of foreign material. Technical modifications for magnet delivery under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance are currently underway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)