Menu
×
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
- Author(s): EPPPIC Group (CORPORATE AUTHOR)
- Source:
Lancet. 3/27/2021, Vol. 397 Issue 10280, p1183-1194. 12p. - Source:
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms: PREMATURE labor; PREMATURE rupture of fetal membranes; HIGH-risk pregnancy; PROGESTATIONAL hormones; RESEARCH; PROGESTERONE; PREMATURE infants; CLINICAL trials; META-analysis; RESEARCH methodology; SYSTEMATIC reviews; MEDICAL cooperation; EVALUATION research; RISK assessment; INTRAMUSCULAR injections; PREGNANCY outcomes; COMPARATIVE studies; VAGINAL medication
- Abstract:
Background: Preterm birth is a global health priority. Using a progestogen during high-risk pregnancy could reduce preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes.Methods: We did a systematic review of randomised trials comparing vaginal progesterone, intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), or oral progesterone with control, or with each other, in asymptomatic women at risk of preterm birth. We identified published and unpublished trials that completed primary data collection before July 30, 2016, (12 months before data collection began), by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Maternity and Infant Care Database, and relevant trial registers between inception and July 30, 2019. Trials of progestogen to prevent early miscarriage or immediately-threatened preterm birth were excluded. Individual participant data were requested from investigators of eligible trials. Outcomes included preterm birth, early preterm birth, and mid-trimester birth. Adverse neonatal sequelae associated with early births were assessed using a composite of serious neonatal complications, and individually. Adverse maternal outcomes were investigated as a composite and individually. Individual participant data were checked and risk of bias assessed independently by two researchers. Primary meta-analyses used one-stage generalised linear mixed models that incorporated random effects to allow for heterogeneity across trials. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42017068299.Findings: Initial searches identified 47 eligible trials. Individual participant data were available for 30 of these trials. An additional trial was later included in a targeted update. Data were therefore available from a total of 31 trials (11 644 women and 16185 offspring). Trials in singleton pregnancies included mostly women with previous spontaneous preterm birth or short cervix. Preterm birth before 34 weeks was reduced in such women who received vaginal progesterone (nine trials, 3769 women; relative risk [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·68-0·90), 17-OHPC (five trials, 3053 women; 0·83, 0·68-1·01), and oral progesterone (two trials, 181 women; 0·60, 0·40-0·90). Results for other birth and neonatal outcomes were consistently favourable, but less certain. A possible increase in maternal complications was suggested, but this was uncertain. We identified no consistent evidence of treatment interaction with any participant characteristics examined, although analyses within subpopulations questioned efficacy in women who did not have a short cervix. Trials in multifetal pregnancies mostly included women without additional risk factors. For twins, vaginal progesterone did not reduce preterm birth before 34 weeks (eight trials, 2046 women: RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·84-1·20) nor did 17-OHPC for twins or triplets (eight trials, 2253 women: 1·04, 0·92-1·18). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was increased with 17-OHPC exposure in multifetal gestations (rupture <34 weeks RR 1·59, 95% CI 1·15-2·22), but we found no consistent evidence of benefit or harm for other outcomes with either vaginal progesterone or 17-OHPC.Interpretation: Vaginal progesterone and 17-OHPC both reduced birth before 34 weeks' gestation in high-risk singleton pregnancies. Given increased underlying risk, absolute risk reduction is greater for women with a short cervix, hence treatment might be most useful for these women. Evidence for oral progesterone is insufficient to support its use. Shared decision making with woman with high-risk singleton pregnancies should discuss an individual's risk, potential benefits, harms and practicalities of intervention. Treatment of unselected multifetal pregnancies with a progestogen is not supported by the evidence.Funding: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] - Abstract: Copyright of Lancet is the property of Lancet and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Subject Terms:
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.