Group evaluations as self‐group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups.

ATTITUDE (Psychology); BLACK people; BODY weight; CONFIDENCE intervals; GROUP identity; INTERPERSONAL relations; INTERVIEWING; OBESITY; PEOPLE with disabilities; RESEARCH; SELF-evaluation; SOCIAL isolation; SOCIAL skills; SOCIAL stigma; TIME series analysis; SAMPLE size (Statistics); GROUP process; EFFECT sizes (Statistics); RELATIVE medical risk; DESCRIPTIVE statistics

Outgroup favoritism among members of stigmatized groups can be seen as a form of self‐group distancing. We examined how intergroup evaluations in stigmatized groups vary as a function of ingroup typicality. In Studies 1 and 2, Black participants (N = 125,915; N = 766) more strongly preferred light‐skinned or White relative to dark‐skinned or Black individuals the lighter their own skin tone. In Study 3, overweight participants (N = 147,540) more strongly preferred normal‐weight relative to overweight individuals the lower their own body weight. In Study 4, participants with disabilities (N = 35,058) more strongly preferred non‐disabled relative to disabled individuals the less visible they judged their own disability. Relationships between ingroup typicality and intergroup evaluations were at least partially mediated by ingroup identification (Studies 2 and 3). A meta‐analysis across studies yielded an average effect size of r =.12. Furthermore, higher ingroup typicality was related to both ingroup and outgroup evaluations. We discuss ingroup typicality as an individual constraint to self‐group distancing among stigmatized group members and its relation to intergroup evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Journal of Social Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)