[Anesthesia for cesarean section].

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Eldor J;Eldor J; Guedj P; Lavie A
  • Source:
    Harefuah [Harefuah] 1992 Nov 15; Vol. 123 (10), pp. 384-6, 435.
  • Publication Type:
    English Abstract; Journal Article
  • Language:
    Hebrew
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Israel Medical Association Country of Publication: Israel NLM ID: 0034351 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0017-7768 (Print) Linking ISSN: 00177768 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Harefuah Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Tel Aviv : Israel Medical Association
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Of 684 parturients who underwent cesarean section between July 1985-August 1990, 371 (54.2%) were given epidural anesthesia; 50 (7.3%) required general anesthesia after a failed attempt at epidural anesthesia; and 5 (0.7%) underwent inadvertent spinal anesthesia because of dural penetration by the epidural needle. In 258 (37.7%) general anesthesia was decided on before operation. The intentional avoidance of spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in this university hospital is criticized.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 19921115 Date Completed: 19930121 Latest Revision: 20061115
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      1464382