Feasibility and acceptability of a psychosocial and adherence electronic patient reported outcomes (PROs) system at an HIV care center in southern India.

COMPUTERS; MENTAL depression; HIV-positive persons; MEDICAL databases; INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems; MEDICAL research; HEALTH outcome assessment; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK-taking behavior; STATISTICAL sampling; HUMAN sexuality; SUBSTANCE abuse; DESCRIPTIVE statistics

Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs), which consist of questionnaires administered directly to patients via handheld device or computer, allow for the routine and systematic capture of sensitive domains as well as longitudinal data on functional status, symptom severity, and physical and psychological well-being. There have been few examples of PROs in HIV care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and none in India. We conducted a study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of PROs at the Y.R. Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. We adapted an adherence and psychosocial questionnaire into an electronic PRO format and administered it to a convenience sample of 50 participants. Almost all participants indicated that the PRO questionnaire was easy to complete and understand (96%). The percentage who needed any staff help was 83% among illiterate participants but only 13% among literate participants (p<0.001). In summary, an electronic PRO questionnaire was feasible and acceptable in an HIV care center in southern India. Further study, with special attention towards optimizing PROs for persons with low literacy and limited technology experience, is needed to maximize the potential of PROs within HIV care in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS Care is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)