Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Endocuff vision-assisted vs. standard polyp resection in the colorectum (the EVASTA study): a prospective randomized study.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): von Figura, Guido; Hasenöhrl, Moritz; Haller, Bernhard; Poszler, Alexander; Ulrich, Jörg; Brown, Hayley; Abdelhafez, Mohamed; Schmid, Roland M.; von Delius, Stefan; Klare, Peter
- Source:
Endoscopy; 2020, Vol. 52 Issue 1, p45-51, 7p
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Background: Cap-assisted colonoscopy is frequently used to facilitate adenoma detection during endoscopy. However, data on how cap assistance influences polyp resection are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the impact of cap assistance with the Endocuff vision device (EVD) on the resection time for colorectal polyps in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS : A randomized, prospective study was performed in a university hospital in Germany. A total of 250 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to undergo either colonoscopy with the EVD (EVD arm) or standard colonoscopy without the use of a cap (standard arm). The primary outcome was the average duration of polypectomy. Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal and ileal intubation times, and propofol dosage.Results: The use of EVD led to a significant reduction in the median polypectomy time in the EVD vs. standard arm (54 vs. 80 seconds, respectively; P = 0.02). This effect was strongest for polyps ≥ 6 mm. Compared with the standard group, Endocuff assistance also resulted in a shorter cecal intubation time (6 vs. 8 minutes; P = 0.03) and overall colonoscopy time (23 vs. 27 minutes; P = 0.02). In contrast, no difference in withdrawal time was observed. The polyp and adenoma detection rates did not differ significantly between the two groups.Conclusion: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy reduces the duration of polypectomy, which may be due to a more stable scope position during resection. Further studies are needed to investigate whether comparable effects will be seen for other interventions, such as clipping or biopsy sampling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Endoscopy is the property of Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.