The Price of Individual and Institutional Self-Censorship.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      SELF-censorship; FREEDOM of speech; ACADEMIC freedom; COLLEGE campuses; GOVERNMENT policy; MANNERS & customs; HIGHER education
    • Abstract:
      While self-censorship is a necessary part of everyday social life, suppression of campus speech is inconsistent with academic freedom. Such suppression may take the form of speech disruptions and disinvitations, but it may also be the result of speech codes and bias response teams. These practices may lead to judical remedies. Campus self-censorship in the form of the refusal to sponsor campus public policy debates or forums with diverse viewpoints can only be remedied when higher education adopts models of civil disagreement about important public policy issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Society is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)