Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, by Hayden White.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Dean, Carolyn J. (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    American Historical Review. Oct2019, Vol. 124 Issue 4, p1337-1350. 14p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Hayden White's 1973 Metahistory tossed the entire concept of historical science out the window, claiming that historians are fundamentally artists who imbue historical action with aesthetic and ethical purpose. The book urged historians to grapple with whether and how their writing creates rather than reflects reality. It also celebrated the ethics and art of history-writing and diminished historians' empirical claims. There were two receptions of White's work: the first, amply documented, was among intellectual historians and others in humanities' disciplines, especially literary theory; the second took place within the mainstream of the discipline and has received little attention. This essay assesses how mainstream historians' reception of Metahistory unfolded from the 1970s, and with what consequences. Historians focused on White's purported conflation of language and reality and neglected his argument about how and why historians resist theory. In so doing, he demonstrated—and the reception of his work demonstrates in turn—that historians most effectively resist theory when they seem most to engage it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of American Historical Review is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)