Menu
×
Folly Beach Library
9 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
9 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. - 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
Folly Beach Library
9 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6888
Village Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 744-2489
John's Island Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Miss Jane's Building (Edisto Library Temporary Location)
9 a.m. - 4 p.m.
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Dorchester Road Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
9 a.m. - 7 p.m.
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Baxter-Patrick James Island
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Main Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
9 a.m. - 8 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6892
Mobile Library
9 a.m. - 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
- Author(s): Newson, A J; Lacey, S de; Dowling, D K; Murray, S; Sue, C M; Thorburn, D R; Gillam, L; Degeling, C; de Lacey, S
- Source:
Human Reproduction; Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p751-757, 7p, 4 Charts- Subject Terms:
- Source:
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Study Question: Does an informed group of citizens endorse the clinical use of mitochondrial donation in a country where this is not currently permitted?Summary Answer: After hearing balanced expert evidence and having opportunity for deliberation, a majority (11/14) of participants in a citizens' jury believed that children should be able to be born using mitochondrial donation.What Is Known Already: Research suggests that patients, oocyte donors and health professionals support mitochondrial donation to prevent transmission of mitochondrial disease. Less is known about public acceptability of this novel reproductive technology, especially from evidence using deliberative methods.Study Design, Size, Duration: This study comprised a citizens' jury, an established method for determining the views of a well-informed group of community members. The jury had 14 participants, and ran over one and a half days in 2017.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Jurors were members of the public with no experience of mitochondrial disease. They heard and engaged with relevant evidence and were asked to answer the question: 'Should Australia allow children to be born following mitochondrial donation?'Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Eleven jurors decided that Australia should allow children to be born following mitochondrial donation; 7 of whom added conditions such as the need to limit who can access the intervention. Three jurors decided that children should not (or not yet) be born using this intervention. All jurors were particularly interested in the reliability of evidence, licensing/regulatory mechanisms and the rights of children to access information about their oocyte donors.Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Jurors' views were well informed and reflected critical deliberation and discussion, but are not intended to be representative of the whole population.Wider Implications Of the Findings: When presented with high quality evidence, combined with opportunities to undertake structured deliberation of novel reproductive technologies, members of the public are able to engage in detailed discussions. This is the first study to use an established deliberative method to gauge public views towards mitochondrial donation.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was funded by a University of Sydney Industry and Community Collaboration Seed Award (2017), which was awarded contingent on additional funding from the Mito Foundation. Additional funding was provided by the Mito Foundation. The Foundation was not involved in jury facilitation or deliberation, nor analysis of research data.Trial Registration Number: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] - Abstract: Copyright of Human Reproduction is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.