Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
ACCEPTABILITY OF HIV PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) AND OPINIONS ON PREP SERVICE DELIVERY AMONG MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN IN SINGAPORE: A QUALITATIVE STUDY.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Chen Seong Wong; Kumar, P. Arun; Wong, Christina M.; Choong, Bryan C. H.; Lim, Oliver Z.; Yin Ying Chan; Bin Ibrahim, Muhamad Alif; Chio, Martin T.; Tan, Rayner K. J.; Chen, Mark I.
- Source:
AIDS Education & Prevention. Apr2019, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p152-162. 11p.
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
PrEP is effective in preventing HIV transmission among at-risk HIV-negative MSM. A qualitative descriptive study with five focus group discussions (N = 33) involving a purposively recruited sample of Singaporean MSM was conducted from August 2016 to April 2017 to understand local perspectives on potential barriers and motivators to the adoption of PrEP, prior to the implementation of PrEP services in Singapore. Knowledge of PrEP was high, and many viewed PrEP as an attractive alternative to condoms for HIV prevention. Concerns about PrEP included the cost of PrEP and related services, the frequency of PrEP-related clinic visits, fear of side effects, and the stigma associated with using PrEP. Participants felt PrEP was best provided by MSM-friendly providers, and more needed to be done to increase awareness of the effectiveness of PrEP. Access to PrEP for MSM in Singapore has to be affordable, patient-centered, and convenient to maximize the potential benefits of PrEP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of AIDS Education & Prevention is the property of Guilford Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.