18F-FDG PET/CT performed immediately after percutaneous ablation to evaluate outcomes of the procedure: preliminary results.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      18F-FDG PET/CT realizada imediatamente após ablação percutânea para avaliar os desfechos do procedimento: resultados preliminares.
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To determine whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography performed immediately after percutaneous ablation (iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT) is useful in evaluating the outcomes of the procedure. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 20 patients (13 males, 7 females; mean age, 65.8 ± 12.1 years) submitted to percutaneous ablation of metastases. All of the lesions treated had shown focal uptake on a 18F-FDG PET/CT scan obtained at baseline. The primary tumors were mainly colorectal cancer (in 45%) or lung cancer (in 40%). iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed to identify any residual viable tumor cells. The treatment was considered a success (no viable tumor cells present) if no uptake of 18F-FDG was noted on the iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. Results: Twenty-six lesions were submitted to percutaneous ablation with either cryoablation (n = 7) or radiofrequency ablation (n = 19). The mean lesion diameter was 2.52 ± 1.49 cm. For the detection of viable tumor cells, iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 66.7%, 95%, 88.5%, 80%, and 90.5%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and the results of the follow-up studies (kappa = 0.66; p < 0.01). Conclusion: iPA 18F-FDG PET/CT studies appear to constitute a useful means of evaluating the outcomes of percutaneous ablation. By detecting residual viable tumor cells, this strategy might allow early re-intervention, thus reducing morbidity. Studies involving larger numbers of patients are needed in order to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Objetivo: Demonstrar se a tomografia por emissão de pósitrons acoplada a tomografia computadorizada usando-se fluorodesoxiglicose marcada com flúor-18 realizada imediatamente após ablação percutânea (iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT) pode ser útil na avaliação do resultado desse tratamento. Materiais e Métodos: Foram avaliados, retrospectivamente, 20 pacientes (13 homens e 7 mulheres; média de idade: 65,8 ± 12,1 anos) submetidos a ablação percutânea de metástases apresentando captação de 18F-FDG no exame de PET/CT. Os tumores primários foram, principalmente, câncer colorretal (45%) ou câncer de pulmão (40%). A iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT foi realizada para avaliar tumor residual viável. O tratamento foi considerado sucesso (sem lesão viável) se nenhuma captação de 18F-FDG fosse observada na iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT. Resultados: Vinte e seis lesões foram submetidas a ablação percutânea por meio de crioablação (n = 7) ou radiofrequência (n = 19). O tamanho médio das lesões era de 2,52 ± 1,49 cm. A iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT detectou tumor viável com sensibilidade, especificidade, acurácia, valor preditivo positivo e valor preditivo negativo de 66,7%, 95%, 88,5%, 80% e 90,5%, respectivamente. Houve correlação significativa entre os achados da iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT e os resultados do seguimento clínico dos pacientes (kappa = 0,66; p < 0,01). Conclusão: A iAP 18F-FDG PET/CT é capaz de avaliar o resultado da ablação percutânea e poderá permitir reintervenção precoce de lesões residuais viáveis, reduzindo a morbidade. Um número maior de pacientes é necessário para confirmar esses achados. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Radiologia Brasileira is the property of Radiologia Brasileira and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)