Evaluation of blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity by radial artery tonometry versus finger arteriolar photoplethysmography.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Zion AS;Zion AS; Bartels MN; Wecht JM; Sloan RP; Downey JA; De Meersman RE
  • Source:
    American journal of hypertension [Am J Hypertens] 2003 May; Vol. 16 (5 Pt 1), pp. 371-4.
  • Publication Type:
    Comparative Study; Evaluation Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8803676 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0895-7061 (Print) Linking ISSN: 08957061 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Hypertens Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2013- : Oxford : Oxford University Press
      Original Publication: [New York, NY] : Elsevier, [c1988-
    • Subject Terms:
      Photoplethysmography* ; Tonometry, Ocular*; Baroreflex/*physiology ; Blood Pressure/*physiology ; Radial Artery/*physiology; Adult ; Blood Pressure Determination ; Diastole/physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Respiration ; Systole/physiology
    • Abstract:
      Background: Published normative data of noninvasive blood pressures (BPs) and autonomic modulations have been primarily derived from the finger arteriole using the Finapres (Ohmeda Co., Englewood, CO), a device that is no longer manufactured. Currently, beat-to-beat BP are obtained from the radial artery using the Colin tonometer.
      Methods: We compared BP and autonomic parameters in a crossover design between the two devices in 29 subjects during seated rest and a 0.1-Hz breathing protocol. In addition, we tested whether finger arteriolar BP differences were due to pressure changes exerted by the radial tonometer.
      Results: Uniformly, BP measured at the radial artery were significantly higher than those from the finger arteriole. Radial BP (106 +/- 19.5 mm Hg) were higher than finger arteriolar BP (95.8 +/- 13.7 mm Hg) (P <.005). Tonometric baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) (24.0 +/- 18 msec/mm Hg) was higher compared to photoplethysmographic BRS (12.0 +/- 7.7 msec/mm Hg; P <.0003). Systolic BP (radial artery) (115 +/- 25 mm Hg) were higher compared to finger arteriolar BP (97.7 +/- 19 mm Hg; P <.0025) during breathing, as was BRS (25.9 +/- 11.6 msec/mm Hg v 21.5 +/- 11.6 msec/mm Hg; P <.05). Differences in the low frequency systolic BP (LF(SBP)), representative of sympathetic vasomotor modulation, between the two methods, whether absolute, normalized, or log-transformed were not observed.
      Conclusions: There were no differences in arteriolar BP values in the presence or absence of radial artery tonometric pressure. These findings indicate that differences exist in systolic BP and BRS using the tonometer (radial artery) versus the Finapres (Ohmeda Co.) (finger arteriole). Furthermore, these differences are not due to pressure exerted by the radial artery tonometer that supplies blood to the finger arteriole.
    • Grant Information:
      HL 61287 United States HL NHLBI NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20030515 Date Completed: 20030904 Latest Revision: 20191210
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00039-6
    • Accession Number:
      12745198