Classifying Outcomes in Work Motivation Research: An Examination of the Intrinsic--Extrinsic Dichotomy.

A lack of agreement exists in the motivation literature concerning appropriate definitions of the terms intrinsic and extrinsic outcomes and inconsistencies are prevalent when specific outcomes are classified as of one or the other type. This situation led to the hypothesis that the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic are unclear and confusing to industrial and organizational psychologists. This hypothesis was tested by taking a survey of randomly selected members of Division 14 of the American Psychological Association in which surveyed members were asked to define the terms intrinsic and extrinsic and to classify 21 outcomes as either intrinsic, extrinsic, or both. The results of the survey provide support for the confusion hypothesis. Implications of the findings for further conceptual and empirical work are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Applied Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)