Mill’s Defense of Capital Punishment.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Ten, C. L. (AUTHOR)
  • Source:
    Criminal Justice Ethics. Aug2017, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p141-151. 11p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      CAPITAL punishment; MILL, John Stuart, 1806-1873; MURDER; PUNISHMENT in crime deterrence; CRIMINAL justice system
    • Abstract:
      John Stuart Mill strongly supports capital punishment for aggravated murder. He rejects various arguments against capital punishment, including the claim that it is incompatible with respect for human life. He believes that capital punishment is a superior deterrent to the alternative of life imprisonment with hard labor. However, the deterrent effect of capital punishment is achieved by its appearance of severity. In fact, it is less cruel than the alternative, and it is the least severe form of punishment that would effectively deter murder. Mill regards death itself, as distinguished from the manner of dying, as a relatively minor evil. His views on death and capital punishment are not compelling, and, if they were widely accepted, would undermine the seriousness of some types of murder. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Criminal Justice Ethics is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)