Contributed Indexing: Indexing Agency: IND Local ID #: 8018216. Indexing Agency: PIP Local ID #: 068920. Indexing Agency: POP Local ID #: 00204450.
Keywords: Antinatalist Policy*; Asia; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods Chosen*; Contraceptive Prevalence*; Contraceptive Usage*; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries*; Economic Development*; Economic Factors; Education*; Family And Household; Family Characteristics; Family Planning; Family Planning Program Evaluation*; Family Planning Programs; Family Size; Family Size, Desired*; Fertility*; Fertility Decline*; Fertility Determinants*; Fertility Measurements; Fertility Surveys*; Government*; Incentives*; Industrialization*; Latin America; Policy; Political Factors; Population; Population Control*; Population Dynamics; Population Growth*; Population Policy*; Social Development*; Social Policy; Southeastern Asia*; Standard Of Living*
Note: TJ: DEMOGRAPHISCHE INFORMATIONEN 1990/91
Local Abstract: [PIP] The population explosion has been abating since the 2nd half of the 1960s. The birth rate of the 3rd World dropped from 45/1000 during 1950-55 to 31/1000 during 1985-90. From the 1st half of the 1960s to the 1st half of the 1980s the total fertility of such countries dropped from 6.1 to 4.2 children/woman. In Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Malaysia living standards improved as a result of industrialization, and fertility decreased significantly. In Sri Lanka, China, North Vietnam, and Thailand the drop of fertility is explained by cultural and religious factors. In 1982 about 78% of the population of developing countries lived in 39 states that followed an official policy aimed at reducing the population. Another 16% lived in countries supporting the concept of a desired family size. However, World Bank data showed that in the mid-1980s in 27 developing countries no state family planning (FP) programs existed. India adopted an official FP program in 1952, Pakistan followed suit in 1960, South Korea in 1961, and China in 1962. In Latin America a split policy manifested itself: in Brazil birth control was rejected, only Colombia had a FP policy. In 1986 the governments of 68 of 131 developing countries representing 3.1 billion people considered the number of children per woman too high. 31 of these countries followed concrete population control policies. On the other hand, in 1986 24 countries of Africa with 40% of the continent's population took no measures to influence population growth. In Latin America and the Caribbean 18 of 33 countries were idle, except for Mexico that had a massive state FP program. These programs also improve maternal and child health with birth spacing of at least 2 years, and the prevention of pregnancies of too young women or those over 40. The evaluation of rapidly spreading FP programs in the 1970s was carried out by the World Fertility Survey in 41 countries. The impact of FP programs was more substantial than socioeconomic factors. Contraceptive use increased in Mexico from 13% in 1973 to 41% in 1978 among women of fertile age. According to 1984 and 1988 UN data modern methods of contraception were used by 70% of women in China, 60-65% in Southeast Asia, Costa Rica, and Puerto Rico. In contrast, less than 5% used them in most countries of Africa, 15-20% in West Asia, 25-30% in South Asia, and 40% in Latin America. The pill was the most popular method. From the early 1980s in South and East Asia 1/5 of women got sterilized after attaining the desired family size. Less than 10% of women used IUDs in developing countries. FP programs have benefited from higher education levels and economic incentives and sanctions and exemplified in Singapore, China, South Korea, Thailand, and Taiwan.
Processing Request
No Comments.