Pork Barrel Politics: Do earmarks lead to waste and corruption?

EARMARKING (Public finance); BUDGET process; CUNNINGHAM, Randy, 1941-; VOTER identification laws; VOTER qualifications; REALIGNMENT (Political science); BUDGET process -- Law & legislation; LAW

Ever since the country was founded, congressional lawmakers have curried favor with hometown voters by providing funds — known as earmarks — for local projects and favored firms. Recently, however, the number of earmarks has skyrocketed from 2,000 projects worth $10.6 billion in 1998 to 15,584 items totaling $32.7 billion in 2004. Defenders of such spending argue it aids valuable local projects like parks and after-school programs that might otherwise go unfunded. But critics warn that such pork barrel politics also fuels corruption. Former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Calif., recently pleaded guilty to accepting $2.4 million in bribes to direct earmarked funds to defense contractors. Opponents of uncontrolled earmarking also complain that local "pork" projects take funds away from national needs. A current defense spending bill, for example, would divert money from troop support and other Pentagon priorities to local defense contractors for lower-priority projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of CQ Researcher is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)