THEORIZING THE INSTITUTIONAL TORTFEASOR.

Institutions are entities (rather than collections of individuals), with distinct characters and identities that are most aptly explained in terms of institutional culture. The perceptions and actions of individuals embedded in a particular institutional culture are, to a significant extent, caused by that culture. This understanding of the relationship between institutional culture and institutional actors has been incisively theorized in other disciplines, but is virtually absent from tort law. As institutions have become increasingly important players in social life, in comparison with individuals acting qua individuals, the absence of a robust theory of the institutional tortfeasor has marginalized tort law and will continue to do so. Coherent theorization of an institutional tortfeasor requires the translation of ideas about organizational culture and identity into the language of tort doctrine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Alberta Law Review is the property of Alberta Law Review Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)