SAP Madrid 212/2012, de 30 de marzo de 2012.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      SPAIN
    • Abstract:
      The appellant contended that the arbitration agreement would be ineffective as a judicial hearing with the same object, was taking place in another court of the same jurisdiction which would also have violated public order by affecting the right of defence of the private action under Article 1597 of the Civil Code. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      CAUSA DE LA SENTENCIA: La recurrente alega que el convenio arbitral seria ineficaz por hallarse en tramitación un procedimiento judicial en la jurisdicción con igual objeto, lo que además habría vulnerado el orden público al afectar al derecho de defensa de la parte privada de la acción del artículo 1597 del CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Anuario de Justicia Alternativa is the property of Libreria Bosch, S.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)