On the Axiology of Theism: Reply to Klaas J. Kraay.

In 'Method and Madness in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy of Religion' Klaas Kraay offers some methodological considerations that lead to a taxonomy and a larger research project for an axiology of theism. This reply identifies some crucial vagueness and ambiguity in the taxonomy and project, and makes three constructive recommendations for improving the project. It also illustrates how the removal of ambiguity can enable the project to proceed in a straightforward and compelling manner. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Toronto Journal of Theology is the property of University of Toronto Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)