Comparison of RNA- and DNA-based methods for measurable residual disease analysis in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101300213 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1751-553X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17515521 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Lab Hematol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Oxford : Blackwell Scientific Publications, c2007-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: Reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is considered the method of choice for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD can also be determined with DNA-based methods offering certain advantages. We here compared the DNA-based methods quantitative PCR (qPCR), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and targeted deep sequencing (deep seq) with RT-qPCR.
      Methods: Of 110 follow-up samples from 30 patients with NPM1-mutated AML were analyzed by qPCR, ddPCR, deep seq, and RT-qPCR. To select DNA MRD cutoffs for bone marrow, we performed receiver operating characteristic analyses for each DNA method using prognostically relevant RT-qPCR cutoffs.
      Results: The DNA-based methods showed strong intermethod correlation, but were less sensitive than RT-qPCR. A bone marrow cutoff at 0.1% leukemic DNA for qPCR or 0.05% variant allele frequency for ddPCR and deep seq offered optimal sensitivity and specificity with respect to 3 log 10 reduction of NPM1 transcripts and/or 2% mutant NPM1/ABL. With these cutoffs, MRD results agreed in 95% (191/201) of the analyses. Although more sensitive, RT-qPCR failed to detect leukemic signals in 10% of samples with detectable leukemic DNA.
      Conclusion: DNA-based MRD techniques may complement RT-qPCR for assessment of residual leukemia. DNA-based methods offer high positive and negative predictive values with respect to residual leukemic NPM1 transcripts at levels of importance for response to treatment. However, moving to DNA-based MRD methods will miss a proportion of patients with residual leukemic RNA, but on the other hand some MRD samples with detectable leukemic DNA can be devoid of measurable leukemic RNA.
      (© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      Swerdlow SH, Campo E Harris NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Revised 4th. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2017.
      Falini B, Martelli MP, Bolli N, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated nucleophosmin (NPM1): is it a distinct entity? Blood. 2011;117:1109-1120.
      Forghieri F, Comoli P, Marasca R, et al. Minimal/measurable residual disease monitoring in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a clinical viewpoint and perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(11):3492.
      Thiede C, Koch S, Creutzig E, et al. Prevalence and prognostic impact of NPM1 mutations in 1485 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood. 2006;107:4011-4020.
      Chen X, Xie H, Wood BL, et al. Relation of clinical response and minimal residual disease and their prognostic impact on outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1258-1264.
      Gorello P, Cazzaniga G, Alberti F, et al. Quantitative assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia carrying nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene mutations. Leukemia. 2006;20:1103-1108.
      Schuurhuis GJ, Heuser M, Freeman S, et al. Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: consensus document from ELN MRD Working Party. Blood. 2018;131:1275-1291.
      Chou WC, Tang JL, Wu SJ, et al. Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients bearing nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations. Leukemia. 2007;21:998-1004.
      Hubmann M, Kohnke T, Hoster E, et al. Molecular response assessment by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction after induction therapy in NPM1-mutated patients identifies those at high risk of relapse. Haematologica. 2014;99:1317-1325.
      Kayser S, Benner A, Thiede C, et al. Pretransplant NPM1 MRD levels predict outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2016;6:e449.
      Schnittger S, Kern W, Tschulik C, et al. Minimal residual disease levels assessed by NPM1 mutation-specific RQ-PCR provide important prognostic information in AML. Blood. 2009;114:2220-2231.
      Shayegi N, Kramer M, Bornhauser M, et al. The level of residual disease based on mutant NPM1 is an independent prognostic factor for relapse and survival in AML. Blood. 2013;122:83-92.
      Balsat M, Renneville A, Thomas X, et al. Postinduction minimal residual disease predicts outcome and benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation: a study by the Acute Leukemia French Association Group. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:185-193.
      Kronke J, Schlenk RF, Jensen KO, et al. Monitoring of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the German-Austrian acute myeloid leukemia study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2709-2716.
      Ivey A, Hills RK, Simpson MA, et al. Assessment of minimal residual disease in standard-risk AML. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:422-433.
      Schnittger S, Schoch C, Kern W, et al. Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. Blood. 2005;106:3733-3739.
      Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Ley TJ, Miller C, et al. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2059-2074.
      Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2209-2221.
      Grimwade D, Freeman SD. Defining minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: which platforms are ready for "prime time"? Blood. 2014;124:3345-3355.
      Voso MT, Ottone T, Lavorgna S, et al. MRD in AML: the role of new techniques. Front Oncol. 2019;9:655.
      Delsing Malmberg E, Johansson Alm S, Nicklasson M, et al. Minimal residual disease assessed with deep sequencing of NPM1 mutations predicts relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplant in AML. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60:409-417.
      Delsing Malmberg E, Rehammar A, Pereira MB, et al. Accurate and sensitive analysis of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia using deep sequencing of single nucleotide variations. J Mol Diagn. 2019;21:149-162.
      Dvorakova D, Racil Z, Jeziskova I, et al. Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with frequent and rare patient-specific NPM1 mutations. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:926-929.
      Jongen-Lavrencic M, Grob T, Hanekamp D, et al. Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1189-1199.
      Malmberg EB, Stahlman S, Rehammar A, et al. Patient-tailored analysis of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia using next generation sequencing. Eur J Haematol. 2016;98:26-37.
      Onecha E, Linares M, Rapado I, et al. A novel deep targeted sequencing method for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2019;104:288-296.
      Petrova L, Vrbacky F, Lanska M, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Suitable targets for minimal residual disease monitoring? Clin Biochem. 2018;61:34-39.
      Pettersson L, Chen Y, George AM, et al. Subclonal patterns in follow-up of acute myeloid leukemia combining whole exome sequencing and ultrasensitive IBSAFE digital droplet analysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:2168-2179.
      Pettersson L, Leveen P, Axler O, et al. Improved minimal residual disease detection by targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction in Nucleophosmin 1 type a mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2016;55:750-766.
      Thol F, Kolking B, Damm F, et al. Next-generation sequencing for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukemia patients with FLT3-ITD or NPM1 mutations. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2012;51:689-695.
      Dvorakova D, Lengerova M, Pospisilova J, et al. A novel quantitative assessment of minimal residual disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia carrying NPM1 (nucleophosmin) exon 12 mutations. Leukemia. 2009;23:793-796.
      Kapp-Schwoerer S, Weber D, Corbacioglu A, et al. Impact of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on MRD and relapse risk in patients with NPM1-mutated AML: results from the AMLSG 09-09 trial. Blood. 2020;136:3041-3050.
      van der Velden VH, Cazzaniga G, Schrauder A, et al. Analysis of minimal residual disease by Ig/TCR gene rearrangements: guidelines for interpretation of real-time quantitative PCR data. Leukemia. 2007;21:604-611.
      Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1315-1316.
      Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential Medical Statistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. 2003;433-437.
      Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
      Patkar N, Kodgule R, Kakirde C, et al. Clinical impact of measurable residual disease monitoring by ultradeep next generation sequencing in NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Oncotarget. 2018;9:36613-36624.
      Duployez N, Nibourel O, Marceau-Renaut A, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia based on RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion quantification on genomic DNA. Am J Hematol. 2014;89:610-615.
      Hourigan CS, Gale RP, Gormley NJ, et al. Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2017;31:1482-1490.
      Guolo F, Minetto P, Clavio M, et al. Longitudinal minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation in acute myeloid leukaemia with NPM1 mutation: from definition of molecular relapse to MRD-driven salvage approach. Br J Haematol. 2019;186:e223-e225.
      Ommen HB, Schnittger S, Jovanovic JV, et al. Strikingly different molecular relapse kinetics in NPM1c, PML-RARA, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, and CBFB-MYH11 acute myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2010;115:198-205.
      Hasserjian RP, Steensma DP, Graubert TA, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2020;135:1729-1738.
    • Grant Information:
      ALFGBG-720681 the Swedish Government and the County Councils; Skåne University Hospital Research; Region Skåne UFo; Västra Götalandsregionen FoU; Swedish Cancer Society; Swedish Research Council; Lund University Medical Faculty; the Olle Engkvist Foundation; Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond; the Regional Scientific Council of Halland; the Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: NPM1; RT-qPCR; deep sequencing; digital PCR; measurable residual disease; qPCR
    • Accession Number:
      0 (DNA, Neoplasm)
      0 (NPM1 protein, human)
      0 (Nuclear Proteins)
      0 (RNA, Neoplasm)
      117896-08-9 (Nucleophosmin)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210530 Date Completed: 20210817 Latest Revision: 20211204
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/ijlh.13608
    • Accession Number:
      34053184