Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Is the Solomon Amendment Which Denies Federal Funds to Universities That Restrict Military Recruiters on Campus, Constitutional? Pro.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
In 1994, Congress passed a law denying Department of Defense funds to any institute of higher education that prohibits military recruiters access to campus. Congress has since expanded the law, known as the Solomon Amendment, to broaden the number of government agencies included in a fund ban and to require that universities give military recruiters the same level of access as other employers. In September 2003, the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights (FAIR), an association of law schools, led a suit against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and five other Cabinet secretaries, alleging that the Solomon Amendment violated the universities' First Amendment freedom of speech. After a Federal district court upheld the Solomon Amendment, FAIR appealed, and on November 29, 2004, the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed. The U.S. Government appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari on May 2, 2005. Paul D. Clement was named acting solicitor general on July 12, 2004, having served as principal deputy solicitor general since 2001. He is also an adjunct professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University. He received his law degree from Harvard University in 1994. The following is excerpted from the Brief for the Petitioners as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on July 19, 2005. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Supreme Court Debates is the property of Congressional Digest and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.