Readers Reply to Peggy Noonan on 'Awful vs. Empty'.

This article features a series of reader responses to Peggy Noonan's article titled "Awful vs. Empty." One reader expresses support for Donald Trump, highlighting his perceived strengths such as secure borders, low inflation, low unemployment, reduced regulation, and a strong military. Another reader defends Kamala Harris, emphasizing her commitment to the middle class, women, and minorities, and her desire to create opportunities and a dignified society. A third reader questions Harris's qualifications for the presidency, while another criticizes Noonan's characterization of Trump's presidency and raises concerns about the potential risks of a second Trump term. Lastly, a reader uses a medical analogy to argue for the need for substantive answers in politics. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Wall Street Journal - Online Edition is the property of Dow Jones & Company Inc and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)