Influence of thermophilic and mesophilic cultures blended with buffalo milk on camel milk cheese quality and proteolysis.

Summary: Camel milk and its products are gaining higher demand due to their attractive nutritional and therapeutic profile. However, manufacturing of camel milk cheese (CMC) is a challenging task. This study aimed to compare the quality of camel milk cheese made using different starter cultures. Four groups CM (camel milk + mesophilic cultures), CT (camel milk + thermophilic cultures), CBM (camel milk + 10% buffalo milk using mesophilic cultures), and CBT (camel milk + 10% buffalo milk using thermophilic cultures) were created. The cheeses were stored for 60 days at 4 °C to assess their physicochemical, sensory, and proteolytic properties. Results indicated highest moisture content in CM (70.19%) as opposed to the lowest moisture in CBT (55.19%). In addition, CM and CBM revealed lower acidity (0.63% and 0.66%) in contrast with CT and CBT (0.78% and 0.83%, respectively). On the other hand, CBM and CBT exhibited higher contents of protein (21.04, 21.57%) and fat (17.65, 17.70%) during storage. All quality indices of cheese samples significantly declined (P < 0.01) during storage excluding acidity. Sensory analyses revealed that panellists highly preferred CBT treatment followed by CBM and CT. Furthermore, urea‐PAGE and RP‐HPLC were performed for the proteolytic study of cheese samples. The study revealed that the presence of buffalo milk and thermophilic cultures in cheese resulted in a decrease concentration of intact caseins (αs1, β‐, and κ‐caseins) as storage days passed. The degree of proteolysis was found to be higher in CBT compared to CBM, CT, and CM. Based on the results, it was concluded that the use of pasteurisation at 65 °C for 30 min, pH of 5.5, 0.06% CaCl2, and the incorporation of 10% buffalo milk using thermophilic cultures (Lactobaccilus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus) resulted in desirable quality characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Food Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)