Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Comparing stimulus preference and response force in a conjugate preparation: A replication with auditory stimulation.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Cook, Jennifer L.1 (AUTHOR); Baruni, Rasha R.1 (AUTHOR); Pinkston, Jonathan W.2 (AUTHOR); Rapp, John T.3 (AUTHOR) ; Miltenberger, Raymond G.4 (AUTHOR); Deshmukh, Shreeya4 (AUTHOR); Walker, Emma4 (AUTHOR); Tai, Sharayah4 (AUTHOR)
- Source:
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Jul2024, Vol. 122 Issue 1, p11-24. 14p.
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
This study examined a conjugate approach for evaluating auditory stimulus preference for 81 participants using force as a continuous response dimension. First, the researchers used a verbal preference assessment to evaluate each participant's preference for listening to five genres of music. This process identified high‐preference and low‐preference music for each participant. Thereafter, the researchers exposed each participant to the five music genres in a randomized order while using a hand dynamometer to measure their response force to increase the auditory clarity of the music. The results indicate (a) 63% of the participants' high‐preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the highest mean force and (b) most participants' low‐preference music genres corresponded to the genre for which they exerted the lowest mean force. These findings are consistent with those from Davis et al. (2021) and further support using conjugate preparations for measuring the relative value of some stimulus events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.