Launching a Legal Regime: Applying Constitutional Law to Space Law.

This Article analyzes the applicability of constitutional law to rules governing outer-space behavior. By analyzing the uses of text, history, and practice in the interpretation of the United States Constitution and space agreements, I conclude that living constitutionalism provides the best template for interpreting space law. Its method of reading texts to fit modern society aligns with the New Haven School of International Law’s realist focus on values such as equity and human dignity. Beyond interpretation, constitutional law may be particularly informative for rule promulgation. It provides examples of how leveraging John Rawls’s veil of ignorance can enable the creation of rules less tainted by self-interest. This principle can apply to space-law issues such as property rights, debris, and militarization. However, there exist strict limits on applying constitutional law to space law. Constitutional law and international law operate with fundamentally different governance structures. Thus, suggestions that the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 (O.S.T.) is tantamount to a “Space Constitution” reflect an insufficient understanding of the fields’ differences. Still, the O.S.T. is akin to a constitutional preamble that outlines guiding principles and invites us to continue shaping new rules for the global space order we desire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Advanced Space Law is the property of International Society of Philosophy & Cosmology (ISPC) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)