Cerclage in surgically shortened uterine cervix and pregnancy outcome: A retrospective comparison between the abdominal and vaginal procedures.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      JAPAN
    • Abstract:
      Background: Cerclage for uterine cervical incompetence can be performed by the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is indicated for women with a short cervix or a cervical laceration who are inapplicable to transvaginal cerclage (TVC). The larger the volume of tissue removed in cervical conization, the greater the rate of miscarriage or preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare TAC and TVC in post‐cervical conization pregnancies. Methods: A retrospective, two‐group, comparative study was conducted involving subjects who underwent cervical cerclage (TAC, n = 14; TVC, n = 18) following cervical conization and who were cared for at the University of Miyazaki Hospital between 2008 and 2020. We compared study subject characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Primary outcome was incidence of preterm labor <37 weeks of gestation between the two groups. Results: The preoperative median cervical length was significantly shorter in the TAC group (20.0 mm) than in the TVC group (31.0 mm; p < 0.01). Preoperative vaginal discharge cultures positive for Gardnerella showed a tendency to be greater in the TAC group (p = 0.073). There was no significant difference in the preterm delivery rate < 37 weeks of gestation between TAC (1/14, 7.1%) and TVC (6/18, 33.3%) groups, p = 0.10. Noninferiority test using multiple regression analysis showed that TAC is not inferior to TVC regarding gestational age at delivery, even though cervical length of TAC was significantly shorter. Conclusion: Women who were inapplicable to TVC due to a short cervix still achieved an equivalent outcome with TAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)