IDEJNI VIDICI KATOLIČKE KRITIKE MIROSLAVA KRLEŽE. (Croatian)

Conceptual horizons of catholic critique on Miroslav Krleža. (English)

In line with the terminology devised by Stanko Lasić, author of the most comprehensive review so far of the critique on Miroslav Krleža, who classified the catholic critique under “nationalist centre“, the author of this paper decided to also address this critique as a separate centre of critique, due to its volume and intensity (especially in the period between the two World Wars). The paper attempts to present the fundamentals, directions and objectives of catholic critique in the said period. The critique is classified into two sub-centres: Circle of Maraković (Marakovician) and Circle of Lendić (Lendician). Both sub-centres encompass a range of religious, philosophical – ethical and axiological in particular – and political critical observations and objectives. It is evident that the two paradigmatic approaches converge at the point of the criticism of Krleža’s routine negation of Croatian spiritual and literary tradition and his “metaphysical pessimism”, a(nti)theism, social decadence and the “literary Marxism”. They differ in perception of Krleža as a writer. Maraković and his fringe supporters find merit in Krleža as a writer, while Lendić and Lendician sub-centre exclude him from the Croatian literary tradition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sukladno terminologiji Stanka Lasića, koji je do sada dao najcjelovitiji pregled kritike o Miroslavu Krleži, a katoličku je kritiku svrstao u „‘nacionalistički’ centar“, autor je katoličku kritiku zbog njezine brojnosti i intenziteta, osobito u razdoblju između dvaju svjetskih ratova, izdvojio kao poseban kritički centar. Ovaj rad nastoji predstaviti temeljna polazišta, smjerove i ciljeve katoličke kritike o Krleži u spomenutom razdoblju. Autor ju je svrstao u dva podcentra - paradigmatske cjeline: Marakovićevu (marakovićevsku) i Lendićevu (lendićevsku). Oba podcentra zahvaćaju dijapazon religijskih, filozofijskih – posebice etičkih i aksiologijskih – te političkih kritičkih objekcija i ciljeva. Vidljivo je da se dva paradigmatska pristupa sastaju u točkama kritike Krležina negatorstva hrvatske duhovne i književne tradicije te njegova „metafizičkog pesimizma“, a(nti)teizma, društvene dekadencije i „literarnog marksizma“. Razlikuju se u percepciji Krleže kao pisca. Maraković i bliskomišljenici uvažavaju Krležu kao književnika, dok ga Lendić i lendićevski podcentar isključuju iz hrvatske književne tradicije. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kroatologija is the property of University of Zagreb, Centre for Croatian Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)