Consideraciones sobre el deber de confidencialidad en el arbitraje: Un estudio comparado entre España y los Estados Unidos de América.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): GIL SEATON, AYLLEN1
  • Source:
    Anuario de Justicia Alternativa. 2017, Issue 14, p11-37. 27p.
  • Additional Information
    • Alternate Title:
      Considerations on the duty of confidentiality in arbitration: a comparative study between Spain and the United States.
    • Subject Terms:
      CONFIDENTIALITY in arbitration & award; ARBITRATION & award; CONFIDENTIAL communications; COMPARATIVE law; AMERICAN law; SPANISH law
    • Abstract:
      El artículo realiza una microcomparación del tratamiento de la confidencialidad en el arbitraje entre dos sistemas legales diferentes: el de los Estados Unidos de América y el de España. Para ello, en primer lugar, se aporta una aproximación conceptual de la confidencialidad, identificando sus contornos y limitaciones. Para luego analizar, concretamente, el contexto legal de uno y otro sistema, con miras a entender cómo funciona la confidencialidad en el arbitraje y, en definitiva, enfrentar la cuestión de la necesidad de un reconocimiento expreso de estas reglas, cualquiera sea la fuente de este reconocimiento. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      The purpose of this paper is to develop a micro-comparison of the treatment given to confidentiality within arbitration in two different legal systems; that of the United States of America and the other of Spain. With this aim, firstly, I provide a conceptual approach to confidentiality, identifying its contours and limitations. Secondly, the study turns, specifically, to the analysis of the legal context established in both legal systems in order to understand how confidentiality operates in arbitration and confront the question of the need for express recognition of confidentiality rules, whatever the sources of such recognition would be. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Anuario de Justicia Alternativa is the property of Libreria Bosch, S.L. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)