A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension.

WARNINGS; CONSTITUTIONAL law; POLICE attitudes; CONFESSION (Law); FORENSIC sciences; LEGAL procedure; POLICE; CONTROL (Psychology); AGE distribution; CAPACITY (Law); CRIMINOLOGY; DECISION making; DOCUMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; LAW; LEGISLATION

This article summarizes recent developments in constitutional law relevant to the Miranda warning. We describe the origins of the warning, concerns about the use of the Miranda warning, perspectives on the utility of the warning, and the relevance of the warning. We describe how the warning has changed over time, requirements for administering the warning, and procedures that police use in delivering the warning and obtaining confessions. We review case law relevant to "coerced" Miranda waivers and confessions, changes over time in the court's interpretation of what constitutes "coercion," use of the warning with special populations, and the recent focus in case law on individual factors that might impair Miranda comprehension. We review empirical research on factors associated with deficits in Miranda comprehension. We integrate case law rulings and empirical research into suggested approaches to forensic assessment of Miranda comprehension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Behavioral Sciences & the Law is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)